'Existentialism and Human Nature Essay\r'

' exacting individuality and absolute freedom: the primer of all existentialist arguments. The existentialist’s conceptions arise from their held views that since we ar all lastly al whiz, we have absolute freedom everyplace our personality. Existentialists emphasize the â€Å"free and conscious self-importance” which opponents constantly attack, exclaiming that there is a â€Å"higher power” enabling our consciousness. still ar humans so unreserved? Can things be explained solely on blaming ourselves or another being for our nature?\r\nThe existentialist generally entrusts in a sole existence; have in minding that we are wholly in the humans, and that we have no one but ourselves. They also believe in the human being’s capacity to feel more than one kind of torment, and that there are iii different levels to our pain, physical, psychological, and emotional. All of these types of pain give the bounce cause us to become ill-advised and unqu iet. But are we in truth anxious because of this pain, or is it because we ultimately feel alone?\r\nAnd if we are all individuals, can we really feel the same kind of pain as someone else? Existence precedes mettle is also dominant in the bear in mind and thoughts of the existentialist. That is, the bringing close together that we are born into this world without a pre refractory nature, and only afterward in behavior do we regularize out nature through actions and choices. This opposes the handed-d own view that is that essence precedes existence, according to which we are seen as having a purpose, and determine, all of which is located before birth.\r\n(I personally think that the idea of essence preceding existence is alternatively obscure. There is no way that our value and purpose can be determined by genetic code. DNA is what we are, not who we are. ) Existentialists pose another question to the antagonist: how can we be happy in a world devoid of importee and me aning? The loss of external values allows us to derive value from at heart ourselves. This value is greater than any oblige by outside forces, and thus cannot be taken away from said sources.\r\nAlthough many human beings live a life devoid of true happiness, it does not mean that we are incapable of attaining such a goal. If a person finds the meaning for their life, whether it be one meaning, or many, there is a large chance that they can reach out such a utopia without recognizing outside influences. wad of different viewpoints follow different methods, as well as believe in different forces that shape our nature.\r\nIt is in my opinion, as well as that of the existentialist, that we shape our own nature through decisions and actions made by our own free will; that we are ultimately free to act on an individual basis from the influences of outside forces. That we can ultimately dilute the views imposed on us, and achieve a sustainable level of happiness in the process. Huma n nature is a decrepit thing; people are good looking for someone else to blame for their actions and for who they are, nevertheless when there isn’t any. Therefore, there is no one to blame for who we are, but ourselves.\r\n'